We have a school project in California. It is for a structure with shotcrete walls and a shotcrete dome roof shot with an inflatable form. There is disagreement on the nozzlemen qualification panels. One group says that a panel should be shot for each nozzleman for each position (three panels: one vertical, and two for different slopes of the dome) in a single layer with the most congested reinforcing bar in any single layer to simulate job conditions. A second group maintains that the same three panels should be shot, but they should be built up over a period of 6 days in gradual layers to represent the layering of the actual shooting. I think that the first group is correct and complies with the intent of ACI 506. Shooting one-layer panels with the most congested reinforcing bar to be placed in any one layer would best simulate the job placement conditions. I don’t see any added advantage in shooting qualification panels over a period of days in layers and seems to be reading too much into “simulating” jobsite conditions.

In construction of shotcrete dome roofs with inflatable forms, the structural thickness of the dome is built out in layers to prevent overloading the support offered by the inflatable form and foam. Thus, your nozzleman qualification panels should be representative of the dome construction methods. This would include shooting orientation (vertical and varying slopes), shooting procedures (layers), and with the most congested reinforcing. When shotcrete is applied in layers, all you need to do is wait for the first layer to stiffen sufficiently (usually called initial set), before applying the next layer. It is not necessary to wait for days before applying the next lift.

We are considering sealing off the openings of some existing water tunnels by constructing reinforced concrete walls within the openings. One wall, for instance, is 9.25 ft wide by 12 ft high (3 x 4 m) and is to be 22 in. (559 mm) thick. Other walls will be in the range of 18 to 26 in. (457 to 660 mm) thick. What are the limits as to the maximum thickness/size wall that shotcrete can be used to construct? Also, I noticed that in the latest revision of ACI 506R-05 that the previous recommended limits on the reinforcing bar size have been removed. I believe in the past, the reinforcing bars were limited to the smaller-size bars to reduce the development of sand pockets behind the bars. Is there a recommended limit on the size bars that can be used? Perhaps it was in the ACI standard but I just overlooked it.

Experienced shotcrete contractors with qualified crews have often shot structural concrete sections 24 to 30 in. (610 to 762 mm) thick with reinforcing bars up to No. 11 in size. There is no real limit to how thick you can build a shotcrete “wall.” Though earlier versions of ACI 506R, “Guide to Shotcrete,” did recommend limiting reinforcing bars sizes, modern equipment, concrete mixtures, and shooting techniques have proven that large-diameter steel reinforcing bars can be properly encased on a routine basis by experienced shotcrete crews. Thus, ACI 506R was updated to reflect the successful industry practice.

There is a pre-stabilized steep slope (nailing is used along with shotcrete). The client wishes to benefit from the maximum achievable area in plan and is asking for excavation of the stabilized slope to shift back the wall face around a few meters. The new stabilization plan shall include a safe gradual excavation of the existing wall from top to bottom along with the destruction of the existing shotcrete face, reinforcement, and the installed nails. What is the most common destruction method for the existing shotcrete? At the same time, I think pulling out the nails using hydraulic jacks would be applicable.

The existing shotcrete can be removed by many methods, such as using a Hoe-Ram. The existing soil nails could be removed as suggested or left in place and trimmed back to some distance behind the new plane. We would assume that this work would be done from the top down installing new soil nails and shotcrete facing in lifts of approximately 4 to 5 ft (1.2 to 1.5 m).

Is it possible to apply shotcrete on glass? Can shotcrete or concrete bond with glass? If it is an issue due to the smooth surface properties of glass, will sandblasting help? We have made test holes and it is adhered very well, except where moisture penetration through the parapet has compromised adhesion. This is installed with five layers approximately 1 in. (25 mm) thick. We are considering leaving the material in place, patching as required, and removing the existing nonpermeable paints (which are peeling). Our thought is to coat the surface with a variegated colored stain, allowing for permeability of vapor. Can the material be patched as necessary? What is the recommended finish? Do we need to be concerned that the material could permit water penetration? Are there certified contractors in the Cleveland, OH, area?

We are not aware of any specific applications of shotcrete to glass. The glass would have to be tough or strong enough to withstand the sprayed application. We have seen shotcrete stick to smooth surfaces like glass and glossy paint, but have not seen any data on the bond. In general terms, better bond is achieved with roughened surfaces so sandblasting the glass would likely improve the bond.

We are proposing a vertical support of excavation structure using reinforced shotcrete to retain a 10 ft (3 m) high sandy soil. What are the design criteria to choose the reinforcement and the thickness of the shotcrete? Also, what is the minimum reinforcement and shotcrete thickness you would recommend?

FThe shoring design should be done by a competent licensed professional engineer who specializes in earth retention systems. This is not a question that can properly be answered by ASA. You can search for such a professional in our Buyers Guide section of the ASA website shotcrete.org. Another resource is the FHWA Manual for Design and Construction of Soil Nail Walls.

I recently hired a pool contractor to build a residential pool. The contractor has been in business for more than 30 years and has a great reputation. The progress so far is that the pool has been installed using shotcrete. The shotcrete has been curing for the last 9 days. Within the last 9 days, it has rained heavily twice. On the second rainy day, immediately after the rain finished, I walked outside to see the amount of water that had collected inside the pool. I noticed that the water was muddy looking. Upon closer inspection, as the rest of the pool was dry, except for the deep end, there were two trails of water coming from the shallow end and running into the pool of water in the deep end. After getting down into the pool, I noticed that these trails of water were from water bubbling up through the shotcrete floor on the slope closer to the shallow end. The bubbling was like a small stream of water coming up out of the shotcrete in two places. I suppose it is from the hydrostatic pressure from the groundwater under the concrete? My question is should this be concerning? The plaster has not been installed. How should these holes be filled? The holes certainly do not look like they were intentional, as you can’t really even see them, except for the water coming out of them. Is there a problem with the shotcrete installation? Does this mean that my pool will leak when it is filled with water? I would image that if water can come up through the shotcrete, the water can also go down through the shotcrete, resulting in erosion of the soil under the pool? Before the shotcrete was installed, there was no groundwater present and the dirt was dry. (Referenced images can be found here)

It is difficult to make an assessment of a situation like this with a few photos and the description given. Based on your statement that the contractor has an excellent 30-year reputation, we’d suggest you discuss these concerns with the contractor. If his response does not give you a full explanation, we suggest you engage an independent professional familiar with shotcrete installations and swimming pools to give you an opinion. You can use ASA’s Buyers Guide at shotcrete.org to find a consultant.
There certainly is reason to question the quality of the installation based on the description. However, it is not unusual for the pool shell contractor to leave a temporary opening in the shell to relive potential groundwater pressure and prevent floating of the empty pool shell. These holes are, or should be done, in a professional manner to allow complete watertight sealing when filled. In some cases, the openings may include a pressure relief valve.

I am an architect working on a project in which a masonry building was “coated” with a shotcrete or gunite material. It is reported that this was troweled on approximately 20 years ago. We have made test holes and it is adhered very well, except where moisture penetration through the parapet has compromised adhesion. This is installed with five layers approximately 1 in. (25 mm) thick. We are considering leaving the material in place, patching as required, and removing the existing nonpermeable paints (which are peeling). Our thought is to coat the surface with a variegated colored stain, allowing for permeability of vapor. Can the material be patched as necessary? What is the recommended finish? Do we need to be concerned that the material could permit water penetration? Are there certified contractors in the Cleveland, OH, area?

From what you have described, the original work may have been done by the shotcrete process or hand-applied. Typically in the shotcrete process, over a large area at the thickness of 5 in. (127 mm), you would expect to see reinforcing mesh or reinforcing bars.
The material can be patched. If the areas are small, it may be prudent to hand patch. Shotcrete is most effective in larger applications. It is important to select a good repair mortar or mixture design.
ASA does not have a recommended finish. Generally in this type of application, the goal would be to match the existing surfaces as close as reasonably possible.
Many patches are done on bridges and other structures without regard to water penetration.
We do not have certified contractors; however, many of our corporate contractor members have ACI Certified Nozzlemen on their teams and the Buyers Guide on the ASA website can be searched by location and specialty. Also on our website, we have a position paper on “Shotcrete Contractor and Crew Qualifications” with a handy checklist summary that would be useful in qualifying potential contractors for your project.

We are looking at constructing climbing boulders made with shotcrete and using a polystyrene core. Does the polystyrene need to be covered with a protective membrane to protect it during the spraying process? Also, could the polystyrene contribute to the structural integrity of the boulders, or should it just be used as a void-forming material?

Polystyrene is available in various densities and the denser the product, the less likely that the shotcrete process will cause any damage to it. The question of the structural value of the polystyrene needs to be addressed by a competent structural engineer. It is not something that we, as a shotcrete association, feel qualified to comment on.

We have a project in the Los Angeles, CA, area that we have designed as poured-in-place concrete. The contractor would like to shotcrete all basement walls. However, we have columns that are integrated with the wall. A City of Los Angeles technical bulletin does not address shotcrete columns in a wall where the bar spacing varies from the wall. Do you have any experience with this issue and is there a way to shotcrete both the wall and the column?

There have been many prior projects in the city of Los Angeles where columns and pilasters are incorporated into perimeter basement walls. This would likely require a preconstruction mockup panel and might require a waiver from the City Engineering Department. It is extremely important to ensure that the work is done by a qualified and experienced shotcrete specialty contractor who has documented experience doing similar work.