The ASA Technical Questions and Answers is a free service offered to all users, but primarily intended for engineers, architects, owners and anyone else who may be specifying the shotcrete process and/or has need for a possible answer to a technical question.
User agreement: The answers provided to submitted questions are intended for guidance in planning and executing shotcrete applications. This information is intended only for the use of individuals who are competent to evaluate the significance and limitations of its content and recommendations, and who will accept responsibility for the application of the material it contains. The American Shotcrete Association provides this information based on the best knowledge available to them and disclaims any and all responsibility for the information provided. The American Shotcrete Association will not be liable for any loss or damage arising therefrom.
If you are unable to find what you are looking for in the archive, then submit a new technical question.
StructuralQ I am currently involved with the design of an unreinforced masonry building retrofit. Could you point me toward resources concerning the seismic behavior of a reinforced shotcrete masonry wall? I am interested in learning more about the force (shear) transfer between the masonry/shotcrete interfaces.
Shotcrete is a placement method for concrete. Thus, seismic design for concrete is applicable to shotcrete placement. Here’s a link to an article in the Winter 2009 issue of Shotcrete magazine, titled “Seismic Retrofit of Historic Wing Sang Building,” that details the seismic retrofit of a brick building in Vancouver, BC, Canada: https://shotcrete.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2009Win_SCM01pg08-12.pdf.
A second article from 1999, “Seismic Reinforcing of Masonry Walls with Shotcrete,” also gives some input on the design: https://shotcrete.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/1999Fal_Snow.pdf. In general, the structural engineer must evaluate the condition of the existing masonry structure and determine whether the added shotcrete sections will be supplementing the existing capacity or providing the full resistance to seismic loads.
StructuralQ I am helping to design radiation shielding for a cyclotron and we do not have much space. The machine produces both neutrons that must be shielded for as well as gamma rays. I have been told that we could get a density of 3.2 g/cc, which helps for gamma rays, but I need to find out more about the water content of the finished product for the neutron shielding part so I can scale between regular 2.4 g/cc concrete and the high-density shotcrete product. Do you have knowledge of this?
Shotcrete is a placement method for concrete. We have shot a wide variety of concrete mixtures from lightweight to heavyweight to the use of alternative cements. Reviewing ACI 304.3R-96, “Heavyweight Concrete: Measuring, Mixing, Transporting, and Placing,” the key to producing heavyweight concrete is the aggregates used. The document also mentions that more cement paste is needed in heavyweight concrete and that helps to increase pumpability, which is important to use with shotcrete placement. Shotcrete will allow you to minimize or eliminate formwork, so it may have benefits of reducing cost and time for construction. Wet-mix shotcrete generally has a low water-cementitious materials ratio (w/cm) of 0.38 to 0.45. Dry-mix shotcrete tends to be even lower with a 0.35 to 0.40 w/cm. Shotcrete materials achieve this using high-range water-reducing admixtures. As concrete hydrates and gains strength, the available free water in the concrete is consumed, and so may be less of a problem for shielding. Reviewing the 304.3R document, it appears reaching the 3.2 g/cc density is fairly easy, and even higher densities may be achievable. You may want to review the ACI 304.3R document, as it provides a good background of heavyweight concrete mixture design and use.
StructuralQ I am interested in constructing my home using shotcrete applied over polystyrene panels. There are several systems for this, but I’m most interested in avoiding “thermal bridging” that occurs when metal reinforcement passes from the inside of the home to the outside through the foam insulation. I am also interested in fabricating the panels myself, if possible. There was a system utilizing metal reinforcement grids on each side of the polystyrene panel connected by plastic components. Can you point me toward a company that offers this system in the US?
ICS, 3-D panels are structurally reinforced styrofoam panels that, in conjunction with properly applied shotcrete, become a superior building system. This is a proven panel with a global track record and much experience among ASA members. They are located in Brunswick, GA.
StructuralQ I am lining a below-ground conical shaped excavation with shotcrete. Dimensions are approximately 90 ft (27.4 m) diameter by 45 ft (13.7 m) depth. Sand will be moved in and out of the container daily. Temperature range is 590 to 740 °F (310 to 393 °C). Can you tell me if a mixture is available that can meet the following specific conditions: Withstand the temperature ranges noted above without spalling, cracking, etc.; and Resist abrasion assuming hot sand is flowing over the surface area daily?
You certainly have adverse conditions to work with! There are products on the market based on calcium aluminate cements that will tolerate the temperatures you mention and are durable. These products can be placed using the shotcrete process. A list of companies who supply this product can be found at www.shotcreteweb.wpengine.com/pages/products-services-information/buyers-guide/.
StructuralQ I am looking for any information regarding the use of construction joints for permanent shotcrete wall facing. I have found information on placing shotcrete over existing construction joints but none regarding the use of construction joints for the shotcrete wall facing itself.
In many experiences, the spacing and design of the joints are the same as you would expect for a cast in place wall. Walls have been constructed with no joint, with contraction and expansion joints, with a joint that is caulked, with joints containing waterstop, and just about anything else you might see in a cast in place wall. In short, it is suggested to look to the direction given for cast in place concrete. The construction joint should be designed similar to the needs of any cast in place wall.
StructuralQ I am looking for design information for shotcreting a steel sheet pile wall to create a composite structure for a lift station wet well. I can design the sheet piling, which would be driven into the ground in a plan circle of 12 feet diameter, followed by excavation. I need to know the practicality of then applying a layer of shotcrete, primarily as a means of sealing the joints of the sheet pile, protecting the sheet pile from the wastewater, and providing additional wall strength. The lift station will be above the water table during construction, but would be periodically below the water table under groundwater conditions.
There are four common types of sheet pile sealing: 1.) all seams were welded to keep the ground water from seeping in, 2.) the sheet pile surface was sandblasted for bonding, 3.) wire mesh was tack welded to the sheet pile and 4.) rebar was tack welded to the sheet piles. This was done prior to the shotcrete layer. In each case the shotcrete is used as a coating to keep the water from touching the piles and in the third and fourth examples, it is used as a structural coating as well.
StructuralQ I am trying to find an article on the bond strength between two layers of shotcrete. My company is placing a 22″ thick shotcrete retaining wall and, at a later date, we are placing a small amount of shotcrete over the existing shotcrete wall. The Engineer thinks the shotcrete will just falls off over time. Is this true? Can you point me in a direction that might have information on the bond strength between two layers of shotcrete?
There is a paper by Denis Beaupre about this issue in the May 1999 issue of Shotcrete magazine. The simple answer to bonding layers of shotcrete is the same as bonding layers of concrete in typical repair applications. Bonding agents are not recommended. The bond strength between shotcrete layers is generally superior to cast interface because of the impact of velocity and the matrices that form at the bond plane and provide a denser, therefore stronger interface. The key in any bonding situation is primarily dependent on the surface preparation before application of the next layer. The surface must be clean and free of latence and any other unsound materials and should be roughened or textured (gun finish is sufficient) to provide sufficient keying or mechanical locking as required. The surface should be SSD and overspray from progressive application should be controlled. ACI International and the International Concrete Repair Institute can provide direction for surface prep. AASHTO/AGC/FHWA Task Group 37 Report, “Guide for Shotcrete Repair of Bridges and Structures” contains spec and procedure information that should be useful.
StructuralQ I have a 24 in (600 mm) thick shotcrete wall that will have to be scanned for voids. The project has been struggling to locate a local expert who has the capability to scan this thick of a wall. In addition, this new 24 in thick shotcrete wall was dowelled and made “as one unit” together with an existing 24 inches thick cast in place wall. What technique should I use to get the right proportion?
Shotcrete is a placement method for concrete. Thus, all non-destructive testing (NDT) applicable to concrete walls would be usable on your wall. However, it is difficult to get good results with a scanning system for heavily reinforced concrete walls of your thickness. Impact Echo and Impulse Response are two one-sided techniques that can provide good results for a portion of the 24 in thickness though would likely not be able to scan the entire depth. Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity is a potential if you can access both sides of the wall. For one-sided investigation at greater depth you may be able to use a MIRA system. It is sophisticated tomographic system that says it can test from 50mm to 800mm (32 in) thickness. There are national consulting firms that provide these investigation systems. Each requires a highly trained, experienced operator so be sure to verify the firm can document successful experience with the method.
StructuralQ I have a 24 in. (610 mm) thick concrete dome that serves as an enclosure to protect extremely sensitive and important equipment that needs to withstand high impact demands such as tornados or missiles. The contractor is proposing to use the shotcrete method with the following sequence: shoot approximately 1 in. (25 mm) (to achieve reinforcing bar cover); let stand for 8 hours; then place a reinforcing mat; then shoot the majority of the dome thickness; let stand for 8 hours; then place the other mat of reinforcing; then shoot the remaining concrete cover. I am concerned that, with an 8-hour duration between concrete placements, the three layers of concrete will not be adequately bonded such that they behave monolithically. In particular, I would be concerned that the aggregate of the concrete that is shot onto a mat of reinforcement will not be able to make its way “behind” the bar’s deformation, thus causing voids. Please let me know your thoughts on the aforementioned concerns, whether it would be reasonable to shoot a 24 in. (610 mm) dome with a minimum of two layers of reinforcement all at once, and whether any of the ACI codes or standards speak to shotcrete joints parallel to reinforcement.
Multi-layer buildout of shotcrete sections is very common and has decades of successful performance in existing structures. Shotcrete applied to a properly prepared, existing hardened concrete substrate (such as a previously shot shotcrete layer) develops an excellent bond. The high-velocity impact of shotcrete on the surface is in effect like sandblasting, and opens up the receiving surface immediately before exposing it to the fresh cementitious paste. Cores taken through multiple layered shotcrete sections exhibit no signs of reduced bond. Often it is nearly impossible to identify where one layer stops and the next starts.
Incremental placement of reinforcing bars in layered application is also common. Proper shotcrete consistency, nozzleman technique, and air velocity will force fresh cement paste around the back of the bar and fully encase the reinforcing bar, even when in contact with the previous hardened concrete surface.
Shooting a 24 in. (610 mm) thickness at one time with two layers of reinforcement in the mostly overhead orientation of a dome would require use of special concrete mixture designs with chemical accelerators, and would be very difficult to execute with consistent quality. Also, depending on the formwork design, unbalanced loading on the dome by shooting very thick sections adjacent to sections not yet shot would be a potential concern.
For more information on the performance of shotcrete in layers, you can review this article from Shotcrete magazine, “Shotcrete Placed in Multiple Layers does NOT Create Cold Joints.”StructuralQ I have a 24 in. (610 mm) thick shotcrete wall that needs to be scanned for voids. The project has been struggling to locate a local expert who has the capability to scan this thick of a wall. In addition, this new 24 in. thick shotcrete wall was dowelled and made an “as-one-unit” together with an existing 24 in. form-and-pour wall. Any thoughts and ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Shotcrete is a placement method for concrete. Thus, all nondestructive testing (NDT) applicable to concrete walls would be usable on your wall. However, it is difficult to get good results with a scanning system for heavily reinforced concrete walls of your thickness. Impact echo and impulse response are two one-sided techniques that can provide good results for a portion of the 24 in. thickness, although they would likely not be able to scan the entire depth. Ultrasonic pulse velocity is a potential if you can access both sides of the wall. For one-sided investigation at greater depth, you may be able to use a MIRA system. It is a sophisticated tomographic system that says it can test from 50 to 800 mm (32 in.) thickness. There are national consulting firms that provide these investigation systems. Each requires a highly trained, experienced operator—so be sure to verify the firm can document successful experience using the method.