When trying to find a contractor in your area, please visit the Corporate Member page of this website. When constructing water ponds, the liner is always under the concrete just in case the concrete cracks not on top. Master Builders makes a product called Master Seal 345 which is designed to waterproof the concrete before the shotcrete is placed. Using a macro synthetic fiber for strength, flexural and to control shrinkage cracking will help. It comes down to proper prep work prior to placement and curing of the concrete (7 days of water) to control cracks. Bentonite shotcrete could be a possibility or perhaps plastic shotcrete (cement and bentonite shotcrete).
I’m looking for information as to the thickness design of shotcrete for ditch slope lining purposes. Can you direct me?
Typically, the thickness is a minimum of 3 inches and slope lining in the 6 to 8 inch range is often installed. The reinforcing is also variable with the lightest sections with no reinforcing or a low dosage of polyfibers or light welded wire fabric and the heavier sections with rebar. Basically, a lot of different designs can be used. We are not aware of any widely used standards.
We are shotcreting our first wall and the contractor tells us that in shotcrete, the lapping of the bars is not done by putting the bars alongside each other as in conventional pouring of concrete but rather a gap is left between the bars in order to avoid voids behind bars bundles. A two-inch gap is being used on our job. Is there a publication that deals with reinforcing steel placement in shotcrete in general and one that deals with bar laps in particular?
The ACI 506R-90 Guide to Shotcrete, Section 5.4.2 is the publication you are looking for. Amongst other things it states: “If the design allows, lapping of the reinforcing splices should be avoided. Lapped bars should be spaced apart at least three times the diameter of the largest bar at the splice”. If laps are not permitted by the design, then it is best to lap the bars one on top of the other (relative to the shooting orientation), rather than side-by-side, to facilitates proper encapsulation with shotcrete.
I have a special request for a shotcrete mix design. My company has been using shotcrete for about three years, here in Alaska. I have recently had a request to shotcrete a 60’x50′ duck pond to make it waterproof. The problems I am running into are that moose keep walking into the pond, and the pond is on the side of a hill with built up edges around the outside. The mix design I am looking for needs to have an epoxy or some kind of adhesive to help stop the water from running out the cracks. Last, are there any fabric or plastic materials that I could lay down and spray the wet shotcrete on to put on the sides of the pond?
This inquiry involves a lot more than just mix design. First, additives to the mix by themselves will not keep the shotcrete from cracking. To minimize leakage for the proposed application, he will have to use either a waterproofing membrane on top of the shotcrete, or plaster like would be used on a swimming pool. Putting a membrane behind the shotcrete would only serve to keep ground water from entering the pond through the back side. The other aspect to be addressed is the fact that all concrete shrinks, and that is what causes the cracks. So anything that can be done to minimize shrinkage should help. To name just a few items: avoid shooting on a windy and or low humidity day; use aggregates in the mix that have a good record regarding shrinkage; avoid excessive cement content in the mix; use reinforcing steel (mesh or rebar); synthetic fibers help reduce early plastic shrinkage; proper curing is absolutely essential!
I wish to request expert advice from ASA in regard to the Gunite Contractor’s Association method that we are using to make test cylinders (i.e. 6″ diameter and 12″ high shot into a form of 3/4″ square mesh hardware cloth). Since we are currently in the process of guniting a silo and have today received 3,250 psi rather than the mix designed 4,000 psi 7-day strengths, we would appreciate your prompt response.
The method of using 6″ diameter by 12″ long wire mesh cylinders has not been used regularly in several years. The most accepted means of taking samples is as specified in ACI 506 documents which generally require a sample panel of approximately 18″X18″ by 4″ thick from which cores are taken. The cores should be taken at a minimum distance from the edge of the thickness of the panel to yield fair test results. ACI 506.4R-94 references under testing of shotcrete, ASTM C 1140-03 (Standard Practice for Preparing and Testing Specimens from Shotcrete Test Panels. Also ASTM C42/C 42M-03 (Standard Test Method for Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of Concrete. Standard 18″X18″X4″ panels are typically made. ASTM C 1140-03 states a 24″X24″X4″, cores are to be taken 1 core diameter plus one inch from any side of the test panel.
We have a design/build drainage channel project that requires a concrete lining over secant piles in which the secant piles form the main structural walls of a box culvert. The box culvert discharges into the ocean. We proposed a shotcrete concrete liner but there are concerns about the life service durability of shotcrete in a saline environment. Do you have any reference information on this matter that we could use to support our position?
Please refer to the following articles:
Morgan, D.R. “Freeze-Thaw Durability of Shotcrete” Concrete International, Vol. 11, No.8, August 1989, pp 86-93.
Shotcrete magazine Vol. 4, No. 5, Fall 2002, pp. 32-38
Shotcrete magazine Vol. 5, No. 2, Spring 2003, pp. 30-37, “Freeze-Thaw Durability of Shotcrete,”
Gilbride,P., Morgan, D.R. and Bremner,T.W. “Deterioration and Rehabilitation of Berth Faces in Tidal Zones at the Port of Saint John”, ACI, Concrete in Marine Environment, SP-109, 1988, pp.199-227.
Gilbride, P. Morgan, D.R. and Bremner T.W. “Performance of Shotcrete Repairs to the Berth Faces at the Port of Saint John”, Third CANMET/ACI International Symposium on Performance of Concrete in Marine Environment,1996, pp 163-174.
Morgan,D.R., Rich L. and Lobo, A, “About Face-Repair at Port of Montreal”, Concrete International, Vol. 20, No.9, September,1998, pp. 66-73.
The bottom line is that with a properly designed, air-entrained shotcrete, properly applied by qualified nozzlemen, you should be able to get a good quality product, with long-term freeze thaw durability every bit as good as a quality, air-entrained cast-in-place concrete.
We are having a pool built with shotcrete. The pool company has asked us to change the contract to allow them to use the wet method instead of the dry method of shotcrete. I have read through your website and found it helpful in understanding the difference between the two, but I would like to know if one is better or more sound than the other.
Pools are built with both processes. Some find it easier to shoot pools with the wet method. But, when properly done, there should be no difference in performance between wet and dry process shotcrete. Depending on the complexity of the pool, the wet method placement can be faster than the dry method. It comes down to the experience of the contractor and their crews, for a good quality placed pool shell. The nozzleman plays a key role in the placement of well placed shotcrete in both methods. The geographical area may determine the economics of which method is used. Curing of the in-place concrete shell is the same for both processes (water curing for 7 days). Wet concrete has a 90 minute window from the time it is batched at the plant until it placed. Temperature of the material and the air temperature can increase or decrease the set times of the concrete. Typically Ready-Mix companies hold back 10-15 gallons of water in the mix so that the contractor can adjust the slump of the concrete on site. Adding 1 gallon of water over the design mix (amount of gallons of water per yard of concrete) can decrease the strength of the concrete by 200psi.
If you have additional concerns, the following questions should be asked:
- Does the contractor have a good track record of shooting pools with the wet method?
- How many pools have they completed with the wet method?
- Can you provide a list of past completed jobs?
- How do they plan to incorporate the trimmed concrete into the shell? (The rebound and the trimmed concrete play a key role in the final quality of the pool shell.)
- What concrete mix design do they plan to use?
We are building a home where some of the outside walls are bricked. Is there a way to use shotcrete over strand board (chipboard)? If so, how and what cost would there be approximately a square foot for the actual shotcrete installed?
More information is needed before answering this correctly. Shotcrete will stick to strand board, but you need some type of reinforcement (wire mesh) to hold it all together. A good cement plaster mix at a lower velocity would be more economical. Contractors who have shotcreted a house in the past will tell you that it is too time consuming for the money involved.
We have a project that our subcontractor would like to change from concrete liner for a box culvert to a shotcrete liner it is a C.O.E. project. The C.O.E. has questions of durability. Could you help?
If the shotcrete is applied correctly, the durability factor is better than cast in place concrete. The 506 and the ASTM documents have references on this subject. There have been papers written on durability and permeability. Countless culverts have been very successfully relined with shotcrete, not only concrete culverts but also brick lined and galvanized metal culverts. If you broaden the definition of culvert to include tunnels you would most likely be identifying where the largest volume of shotcrete is used as a rehabilitation method. To answer questions of durability, shotcrete should be thought of a process or method of placing concrete. Shotcrete in place is concrete. The higher cement content of shotcrete and the impaction of its placement mix design for mix design of other placement methods create a higher strength and more dense, thus less permeable concrete.
Can you provide input on the applicability of the shotcrete placement method for the structural repair of existing concrete walls? These walls (two) are conventionally reinforced, 31 feet in height and are parallel with a clear spacing of 5′-0″. There length is 150 feet. Structural repair is required at many locations that have experienced spalled concrete with corroded reinforcing bars. Depth of repairs will range from 2″ to approximately 6″. Concrete substrate will have exposed aggregate with a significant amplitude. From a production and cost viewpoint, shotcrete appears to be more applicable than a form and pour or form and pump repair method.
From the limited info given, it sounds like an ideal shotcrete application. But, with many caveats, such as: TOTAL deteriorated substrate removal, thorough removal of all aggregate/substrate that may have been fractured during removal of deteriorated concrete (heavy sandblasting and/or high pressure washing), using a replacement concrete mix with similar properties as the original, thorough cleaning or removal and replacement of corroded rebar, etc. It is suggested to discuss this with a shotcreter in the area that has experience with a similar application. It is also recommended to review related ACI and ICRI publications.