Dry-mix shotcrete adds mixing water to the dry concrete materials as the concrete materials flow through and out the nozzle. Gunite is the original tradename for dry-mix shotcrete. Though you may not find design information using the old gunite name, you will find numerous current design references to dry-mix shotcrete. This includes ACI 506R-16, “Guide to Shotcrete”; ACI 506.2, “Specification for Shotcrete”; ACI 506.6T-17, “Visual Shotcrete Core Quality Evaluation Technote”; ACI 372, “Guide to Design and Construction of Circular Wire-and-Strand-Wrapped Prestressed Concrete Structures”; ACI 350-06, “Code Requirements for Environmental Engineering Concrete Structures”; ACI 350.5, “Specifications for Environmental Concrete Structures”; as well as seven ASTM standards that directly cover shotcrete. ACI 318-19, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete,” has also added specific shotcrete provisions. Dry-mix shotcrete has been used for decades to build structural concrete walls over 50 ft (15 m) high in circular prestressed concrete tanks that withstand a full head of water pressure. This is substantially greater water pressure than your 5 ft vault wall would experience. There are no limitations in the dry-mix placement process that would preclude use in high walls. Both dry-mix and wet-mix shotcrete using quality materials, proper equipment, and experienced placement crews will produce in-place concrete of equal strength, durability, and low permeability. However, generally wet-mix shotcrete can offer placement rates up to four times higher than dry-mix. Thus, in thicker, longer walls, wet-mix shotcrete may be more cost effective because it can be placed faster.
I’m not satisfied with my subtrades blowout procedures for the shotcrete lines. I’m not an expert in this; however, the way they are doing it does not look safe. I’ve tried to Google and reach out to other shotcrete companies but have not had any luck. They use a hopper that concrete is pumped into and is disbursed through lines that are moved manually; this step is normal. But when they have a blockage or cleaning the line when done, they have two workers sit on the end. They use compressed air. There must be a better way to clean and clear a blockage than having human bodies as weights. Please give me some guidance.
ASA’s “Safety Guidelines for Shotcrete” specifically addresses hose blockages. Use of compressed air to clear blockages or for cleaning the lines is not recommended. The Guidelines state:
“With the variety of shotcrete material delivery systems available, and their placement on individual job sites, the Contractor should establish site-specific safety procedures applicable to the specific delivery systems and site conditions for blockage removal. Any field procedures for clearing blockages should not use compressed air as means to remove or dislodge blockages.”
Using water to clear blockages or the delivery lines when finishing shooting is the recommended procedure. However, if compressed air is used, the hose end must be securely fastened with a substantial fastening system that can routinely and safely handle the forces created if the concrete is discharged explosively. Shotcrete contractors have developed cleanout bins that clamp the hose end into a heavy steel tank and collect the waste concrete from the line for disposal. Others have created clamps that firmly hold the end of the hose to a loader bucket or other heavy piece of equipment, thus depending on the weight of the equipment to hold the hose end. Simply having two people sitting on the hose end is not safe and can result in injury to crew members. Even when holding the hose end with a clamping system on heavy equipment, clearing the line can cause an explosive discharge of concrete with material flying in a wide path from the hose. Unless planned for and contained, the material stream can hit adjacent workers, facilities, equipment, and vehicles.
Surely you are aware of the recent OSHA regulations regarding Respirable Crystalline Silica (RCS). Does ASA have any information about typical levels of RCS generated during indoor shotcreting? Do you have any recommendations for an apparatus to test levels to ensure safety of our workers and OSHA compliance?
ASA has closely followed the development of the new OSHA rules for a couple of years before they were put into effect. You can find several articles in Shotcrete magazine that specifically address the rules in consideration of shotcrete application. In the Summer 2016 issue, an article, “OSHA’s New Crystalline Silica Rule–Potential Impact on Shotcrete Operations,” addressed many of the concerns. Unfortunately, with the wide variety of shooting conditions, there are no generic values. The reason for this is that the levels can vary significantly due to a variety of factors, including:
- The materials used—this includes comparing wet-mix to dry-mix and the variations in variability of concrete mixture design ingredients (for example, silica fume, fly ash, and accelerator).
- Equipment
- Dry-mix gun type (rotary or chamber), using a predampener or not (type of wet-mix pump likely doesn’t make much difference)
- Size of air compressor (more air might result in more dust)
- Delivery line and hose (1.5 in. [40 mm] hose versus 2 in. [50 mm]) can change volume of flow, and then level of acceleration and nozzle stream dispersion as a function of air volume)
- Nozzle type can significantly affect the material stream
- Shooting location (inside or enclosed, or open air)
With so many variables it is difficult, if not impossible, to get any reliable “generic” number for shotcrete as a whole. Many of our shotcrete contractors are using air quality consulting firms or testing labs who have the monitoring equipment. You may want to note that silica fume is amorphous silica, not crystalline, so it is not hazardous. Most exposure to crystalline silica is through sawing, cutting, or grinding of hardened concrete. We expect that most shotcrete contractors will need to establish a reliable, accurate level by on-site testing because shotcrete is not directly covered in Table 1 of the OSHA rule.
What is the maximum lift for an 8 in. (200 mm) wall against wood lagging temporary shoring?
There is not a fixed value that one can use for maximum lift height. The maximum lift height when bench shooting is controlled by the concrete mixture (admixtures, aggregate, slump), concrete temperature, size and layout of reinforcement, substrate being shot against, and ambient temperatures. These factors must be evaluated by the nozzleman during the placement. The maximum height is constrained by the ability of the fresh concrete in the lower portion of the lift to carry the weight of concrete in higher portions without creating sagging or sloughing. Hot weather conditions will allow higher lift heights than cold weather in non-accelerated concrete mixtures.
Are there industry-standard design guides for the design of formwork for shotcrete? I have reviewed the technical questions and found the article “Dynamic Forces during Shotcreting Operations” by Frederic Gagnon and Marc Jolin, but the impact loads in this article are quite small (approximately 90 lb [40 kg] per nozzle application), and I feel uncomfortable using that as the sole design load. However, since there is little to no hydrostatic load from shotcrete, I am having a difficult time coming up with a reasonable design load in lieu of this.
Shotcrete placement produces very localized pressure on the one-sided forms we typically use. The 90 lb (40 kg) is a reasonable figure when shooting directly against the form. If shooting thick walls, we typically use a benching approach for placement that puts most of the force directly on the supporting floor (or earth) and putting little force on the form. Thus, the form is more of a way to define the back surface. You will often see shotcrete forms in lower-height applications using thin forming materials such as Masonite, pegboard, or even a stay-form for the formed surface. Often, the larger load controlling the design on a form may be the wind loads expected during the construction period.
What is the cure time for shotcrete?
Shotcrete is a placement method for concrete construction. Shotcrete-placed concrete should be properly cured to provide desired strength and reduce potential shrinkage. ACI 308.1-11, “Specification for Curing Concrete,” and ACI 308R-16, “Guide to External Curing of Concrete” are excellent reference documents. ASA recommends curing a minimum of 7 days, and prefers curing with water, maintaining a continuously wet surface condition for the 7-day period. If using a curing membrane instead of water curing, ASA recommends applying the curing membrane at twice the curing membrane manufacturer’s recommended application rate, and applying in two layers with the second perpendicular to the first. If applying a coating over the final concrete surface, you should check with the coating supplier to verify the duration and properties required before application of the coating.
Are there published tolerances for shotcrete, specifically wall thickness, plumbness, and irregularities in surface, or should these tolerances be provided on the construction drawings? ACI 117 provides these tolerances for cast-in-place concrete, but specifically states it does not apply to shotcrete.
ACI 117 provides an excellent guide for tolerances for concrete structures. Although shotcrete is concrete, ACI 117 specifically excludes shotcrete because shotcrete’s unique method of placement permits a wider variety of applications and uses than that of form-and-pour concrete. Shotcrete can generally be finished to the tolerances required for the application. For example, lining a channel might not need close tolerance control, while an Olympic luge/sledding track or skateboard park may require very exacting tolerances. ACI 506.2-16, “Specification for Shotcrete,” in the Tolerances section (and the Mandatory checklist item) requires the specifier producing the contract documents to provide the tolerances required for the project. ACI 506R-16, “Guide to Shotcrete,” Section 3.8, Tolerances, provides a more descriptive commentary. Pertinent portions of that section include:
- Tolerances provide an indication of the finished product expected by the owner, but meeting tolerances may require additional effort and cost. Tolerances given by ACI 117.1R, for placement of reinforcing steel, cover over reinforcing steel, and overall alignment of cast-in-place structural members should be generally the same for shotcrete. Tolerances that require distinct values for shotcrete construction are cross-sectional dimensions, cover, and surface finish (or flatness). Therefore, specifying tolerances that can be consistently achieved are needed so that project expectations can be met at a reasonable cost.
- Specified tolerances should be based on use and function and can be the same as concrete, but are typically broader. Some finished surface tolerances may be waived to achieve proper coverage over existing reinforcement.
Although some shotcrete structures have been allowed greater tolerances than allowed for concrete, shotcrete structures can be built to the same degree of accuracy and tolerance as cast-in-place concrete.
You should review the entirety of Section 3.8, Tolerances, in ACI 506R-16 to get a complete description of tolerances for shotcrete placements.
Will the new ACI Tech Note for core evaluation (ACI 506.6T-17, “Visual Shotcrete Core Quality Evaluation”) replace ACI 506.2-95, “Specification for Shotcrete”? That document has some sections about core evaluation.
ACI 506.2-95, “Specification for Shotcrete,” is the deprecated version, and is no longer published (it isn’t readily available on the ACI website). Thus, the Tech Note along with the current ACI 506.2-13, “Specification for Shotcrete,” is the current industry standard for evaluating cores. An engineer may specify use of the outdated ACI 506.2-95; however, they are opening up their exposure because it isn’t the current standard. This is similar to the exposure if an engineer uses a much older version of ACI 318, and not the current one.
Can we find an appropriate and easy way to evaluate the shrinkage performance of shotcrete?
Shotcrete is a placement method for concrete. So, standard concrete tests for shrinkage are applicable. You will find an article from Shotcrete magazine, “Shotcrete Testing—Who, Why, When, and How,” helpful. The specific section on drying shrinkage tests says:
“Drying shrinkage of the shotcrete can be tested using general provisions of ASTM C157. Because the shotcrete is shot into a large panel and not into the relatively small mold specified by ASTM for the shrinkage test beam, it is recommended that a beam approximately 11.25 in. (285 mm) in length be sawed from a test panel. As most shotcrete uses coarse aggregate less than 1 in. (25 mm), a 3 in. (75 mm) thick panel with a 3 in. (75 mm) wide cut should approximate the ASTM requirements. The A/E should specify in the contract documents drying shrinkage limits that are appropriate for the design of the structure.”
Can we find an appropriate and easy way to evaluate the
Shotcrete compressive strength should be tested using cores from test panels. Shotcrete cannot be shot into closed cylinder forms and be representative of the in-place shotcrete. ASTM C1140-11 and C1604-05(2012) provides the panel configuration and compression testing requirements. However, if using the wet-mix process for shotcreting and one wants to verify the compressive strength, air content, or temperature of ready mixed concrete materials as delivered, rather than as shotcreted in place, samples can be taken from the truck before pumping. These cylinders would follow ASTM C31-15 for making and curing concrete test specimens.