We are working on a geotechnical project in the northwest to repair an existing rockery retaining wall. The wall is around 750 ft (229 m) in length and up to 12 ft (4 m) in height. The issue is that some of the basalt boulders within the wall are weathered soft and falling apart. The total weathered rocks that are falling apart comprise approximately 7% of the wall. Can we use shotcrete on the weathered rocks to give them more stability as a repair process? If not, is there a process we can use with shotcrete to repair the wall without having to rebuild the entire wall?

Shotcrete has been used in the Northwest to strengthen and overlay existing rockery walls. The need to remove the weathered material is dependent upon the need for the overlay to bond with the existing wall, which is an engineering issue and not a shotcrete issue. Shotcrete can and is shot successfully against soil and other weathered surfaces.

In regards to the strength of shotcrete and weather is there a Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) regulation requiring our paste cylinder sample results to be above a certain psi (MPa)?

Shotcrete is normally expected to meet or exceed 4000 psi (27.6 MPa). We are not aware of any specific MSHA requirements. We would suggest you consult a tunnel or mining engineer who is well-versed with shotcrete. Cores taken from field-shot test panels are generally used for the evaluation of compressive strength of shotcrete (ASTM C1140/C1140M-11).

Can shotcrete be effectively used to repair holes in an old 8 ft (2.4 m) diameter storm sewer tunnel constructed of stone/brick/mortar? One of the holes is completely worn through to the earthen backfill material. The other two holes are missing the innermost layer of stone masonry, but the outer layer of masonry is still in place.

The friction coefficient n of well-finished shotcrete for use in Kutter’s equation (and, more streamlined, Manning’s equation) is generally used as 0.012. Shotcrete is used not only to improve flow characteristics of brick, corrugated metal, or any other pipe construction but can also be conventionally reinforced as a structural liner to eliminate the need for liner plates or other pipe-lining alternatives.

We are a local agency considering the repair of a number of older culverts with shotcrete. Like most agencies, we are trying to be creative about maximizing our funds. We work with a federal agency when it is determined that a “new” culvert is needed. In other words, the agency will not pay for maintenance repairs but will pay for “new” culverts. We are wondering if the shotcrete method has ever been viewed as a means of creating a “new” culvert. Could the existing culvert be considered as merely a form for the new culvert? Could you also speak to the life expectancy of shotcrete (life cycle) versus a new concrete culvert?

Shotcrete has been used extensively for the purpose of relining existing culverts. You are correct to visualize the existing culvert as a form for building a new structure. Because it is a stay-in-place form, it may actually act as a composite structure. Shotcrete is a method of placing concrete and will have similar, if not better, durability and life span if installed professionally with good mixtures. You can locate numerous past articles on durability of shotcrete that have appeared in Shotcrete magazine in the magazine’s archive on the ASA website, shotcrete.org. Similar work has been done in California, Colorado, and other states. This approach is currently being used as permanent tunnel lining in many places, including many of the current New York Transit projects.

A knowledgeable contractor will develop a mixture and procedures to ensure that the timing of the subsequent blast is compatible with the set time of the shotcrete. Preconstruction testing should be required to establish the set time (both early and final set) to assist in developing the sequence of operations. The set time will also be impacted by the site conditions, such as temperature.

We are considering a shotcrete lining of a new corrugated metal pipe to improve the smoothness and hydraulic capacity. What is the minimum thickness over the corrugations and should we be looking at any reinforcement or studs to support the shotcrete?

This has been done in the past to improve hydraulic capacity and provide better wear resistance in the invert. Typically, the minimum cover over the corrugation is 2 to 3 in. (51 to 76 mm) with a welded-wire fabric either welded or otherwise attached to the corrugated pipe. The cover could likely be reduced with the use of structural fibers of either steel or synthetic material. Steel fibers and wire mesh should not be used together. Care must be taken to specify the required finish. This application would likely benefit from a smooth trowel or light broom finish. A light broom finish is preferable from a safety standpoint, as a trowel finish creates a very slippery surface both during construction and for the maintenance at a later date. In addition to the hydraulic and wear characteristics, once shotcreted, the entire pipe will become a composite section with improved structural characteristics. It should be noted that the pipe must be large enough for workers to work in safely and productively. This would mean an absolute minimum of 48 in. (1219 mm) and preferably larger.

A knowledgeable contractor will develop a mixture and procedures to ensure that the timing of the subsequent blast is compatible with the set time of the shotcrete. Preconstruction testing should be required to establish the set time (both early and final set) to assist in developing the sequence of operations. The set time will also be impacted by the site conditions, such as temperature.

We will be shotcreting the inside of a tunnel entrance. The plan is to apply 3 ft (0.9 m) of shotcrete on the walls and ceiling to support a large section of limestone rock 22 ft (6.7 m) high, 30 ft (9.1 m) wide, and 20 ft (6.1 m) deep above the tunnel at the entrance that has moved and is wedged and supported with an existing steel structure. We would like to test the shotcrete and are wondering what type and quantity of tests you recommend and which testing labs are in our area that would be able to conduct the testing?

The article “Shotcrete Testing—Who, Why, When, and How” in ASA’s Summer 2011 issue of Shotcrete magazine should help answer most of your questions on testing of shotcrete. ACI 506R, “Guide to Shotcrete,” and ACI 506.2, “Specification for Shotcrete,” also have helpful information on shotcrete testing. Most competent testing labs should be able to test the compressive strength of cores extracted from shotcrete panels or sections, as they are very similar to concrete cylinder tests. If conducting more advanced testing, you may want to consider selecting a lab experienced with shotcrete.

I am considering the use of shotcrete as an alternative to grouted riprap for slope stabilization. The project involves a basin with varying slopes and easily erodible soils. Water will cascade down the side slopes. I was going to specify shotcrete with welded-wire reinforcement but am now considering fiber-reinforced shotcrete. Is fiber-reinforced shotcrete the better choice and, if so, is 3 in. (76 mm) thickness sufficient?

Structurally, using proper quantities of either welded wire or fibers should work well. If fibers are used, they should be specified by an engineer who has the experience to specify the type of fiber and either performance requirements or dosage levels. The advantage of fibers is that they are uniformly distributed through the section, whereas the welded-wire reinforcement can be difficult to maintain in the proper location within the pavement section. The proper thickness should also be determined by a qualified engineer, as soil and groundwater pressures can impact the required thickness.

We are considering a shotcrete application over a weathered rock outcrop (consisting of sandstone, siltstone, and clay stone) in our backyard to prevent further erosion and unstable conditions. Does the outcrop need to be prepared as described in your previous Shotcrete FAQs (loose material removed, saturated surface-dry [SSD]) if a mesh that is anchored to the outcrop will be used? Also, will the shotcrete need to have fibers in the mixture? Do we need joints?

It is always a good practice to scale off the loose material from the rock face, particularly when dealing with shale or clay stone, as they degrade when exposed to the air. In addition to scaling the rock face, it should be washed down with air and water prior to gunning. As for expansion joints, they are not normally used when gunning over natural rock. The shotcrete is typically gunned continuously across the hillside without any expansion joints, with a natural gun finish following the natural contours of the rock face. With an anchored mesh in place, the use of fibers is not necessary. In many applications, fibers can be used in place of or in addition to mesh.

We are currently placing a shotcrete wall in a tunnel. The wall has a minimum thickness of 8.25 in. (210 mm) and is placed against secant piles. Our specs called for a wet cure. To minimize shrinkage cracking, what is the minimum amount of time to allow after shotcrete placement before the wet cure is applied?

There is a difficult balance between wet curing too early or too late. You should not add water too early (before the material sets), as this would increase the water-cement ratio (w/c) of the material on the surface. You also do not want to add water during the finishing process, as this would also work the water into the surface and increase the w/c at the surface. Good practice would be to use an evaporative retardant, which generally also serves as a finishing aid during the finishing process, and then get the wet cure set up as soon as possible.