Project Name:
Courthouse Commons Tunnel
Location:
San Diego, CA
Shotcrete Contractor:
Atkinson Construction
Architect/Engineer:
McMillen Jacobs Associates
Material Supplier/Manufacturer:
The Quikrete Company
Equipment Manufacturer:
Normet
General Contractor:
Holland Partner Group
Project Owner:
Holland Partner Group
Project Name:
M4-M5 Link Tunnels
Location:
Sydney, Australia
Shotcrete Contractor:
Acciona Bouygues Samsung Joint Venture
Architect/Engineer:
Jacobs Aurecon Joint Venture
Material Supplier/Manufacturer:
Bekaert
Equipment Manufacturer:
Normet Asia Pacific Ltd
General Contractor:
Acciona Bouygues Samsung Joint Venture
Project Owner:
Jacobs Engineering Group
Construction of sprayed concrete lining (SCL) ground support across the world utilizes the construct, verify and rework cycle. This methodology typically requires survey verification of the as-built result against design for each stage of the ground support installation. However, processing and analyzing the measurement data is a time consuming and often intensive manual process.
Since the shotcrete process originated well over 100 years ago, improvements in materials, equipment, and placement techniques have enabled it to become a well-proven method for structural concrete placement. The efficiency and flexibility of shotcrete have been used to great advantage in sizable structural projects, as the high-velocity impact inherent in the process provides the compaction needed to turn low-slump concrete into freestanding vertical and overhead placements with minimal formwork.
The recent Position Statement #2, “Spraying Shotcrete on Synthetic Sheet Waterproofing Membranes,” published by the ASA Underground Committee, pointed out many aspects critical to successful performance and raised some potential issues affecting the placement.1 In the position statement, specific techniques are presented to prevent problems such as delamination, voids, or fallouts. In the discussion, the potential issue of steel fiber-reinforced shotcrete (FRS) causing damage and potentially puncturing the membrane was raised. From the experience of the committee and the available information, it was concluded that: • The forces acting on the fiber are not strong enough to push the fiber into the membrane; and • The fibers tend to orient parallel to the membrane on impact, thus reducing the risk of damage. In parallel, a research project on this subject had been undertaken at Université Laval’s Shotcrete Laboratory, with the results only recently available. This article presents the results of this investigation.2 It is intended to support ideas presented in the ASA position paper and to help in the decision-making process when dealing with waterproofing membranes and FRS in underground projects.
The addition of fibers to concrete and mortars as reinforcement is not a new concept. The ancient Egyptians used straw to reinforce mud bricks for use in structures like the core walls of the pyramids. During the first century AD, the Romans incorporated horsehair fibers in the construction of structures like the Coliseum to help prevent drying shrinkage cracking of the concrete. In the modern era, the first scientific studies on the use of steel fibers to reinforce concrete date back to the 1960s and 1970s.1,2 The use of steel fiber-reinforced shotcrete (FRS) was first introduced in the 1970s.3 The first documented use of FRS was in 1973 by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in a tunnel adit project at the Ryrie Reservoir in Idaho. Soon thereafter it became well recognized that soil and rock excavations could effectively be stabilized with steel FRS and its use and acceptance increased globally. In the mid-1990s, the use of macrosynthetic fibers in shotcrete was developed and has increased with particular success in temporary support in underground mines where large deformation capacity is desired. Since the 1970s, thousands of projects have been successfully completed using fibers as reinforcement, including shotcrete, slabson-ground, composite steel decks, slabs-on-pile, and precast elements.
The Plymouth Tunnel is a 1020 ft (311 m) sequential excavation method (SEM) tunnel located in Silver Spring, MD, that makes up a portion of the Maryland Transit Authority’s (MTA) Purple Line light rail connecting the existing metro lines around Washington, DC. The Purple Line Transit Constructors (Flour/Lane/Traylor Joint Venture— PLTC) is the Lead Contractor with the Traylor personnel self-performing the excavation and lining work for the Plymouth Tunnel.
Shotcrete is a placement method for concrete. It is routinely used for a wide variety of structural applications. It has been used for both initial and final linings in tunnels where it is commonly reinforced with wire mesh, fibers, or reinforcing steel. You may want to review our past Shotcrete magazine articles on tunnel shotcrete at https://shotcrete.org/archive-search/
using keywords such as “tunnel,” “underground,” and “linings.” Also, we have two position papers from our underground committee: “Spraying Shotcrete Overhead in Underground Applications,” and “Spraying Shotcrete on Synthetic Sheet Waterproofing Membranes,” that you may find informative. Also, ACI 506.5R-09, “Guide for Specifying Underground Shotcrete,” can provide insight into topics important for using and specifying underground shotcrete.
The minimum strength for safety must be established by the designer based on the specific structural and geotechnical aspects of the project. The minimum strength value may also be influenced on whether using fiber-reinforced shotcrete or plain shotcrete. The early-age strength was tested with a Meyco Needle Penetrometer after creating a time (early) strength curve with minimum tests at 10 minutes and 30 minutes with Needle Penetrometer; then at 3 hours and 6 hours with Hilti Studs; then at 1, 7, and 28 days with cores. Thus, the curve was calibrated for the specific mixture and environmental conditions. It was also useful to identify when early strength (and potentially long-term strength) was lacking.
Some mines have used chain link mesh in shotcrete in severely deforming ground and claim that it is better in holding the ground than mesh after large deformations, in which the shotcrete sustains major cracking with deformations. Other than for such unusual applications, we do not recommend the use of chain-link reinforcement in shotcrete. It cannot be fixed “tight” and as such is susceptible to vibration and movement during shooting, resulting in shotcrete sloughing and formation of voids in the shotcrete. Also, the mesh interconnections are conducive to the formation of voids during shooting. Additionally, there don’t appear to be any consistent material standards on the strength, flexibility, or brittleness of the steel (or other materials) used in the fencing material, so a designer has no way to establish the tensile or flexural strength of the concrete sections. In brief, don’t use chain-link mesh if you want to produce quality, durable shotcrete.